Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia vol. 11 (2016)
URI dla tej Kolekcjihttp://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/2922
Przeglądaj
Przeglądanie Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia vol. 11 (2016) według Temat "chronology"
Aktualnie wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyniki na stronie
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja About the Chronology of the Beginning of the Metal Ages(Fundacja Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego, 2016) Kadrow, SławomirThis article discusses the cases of the Bayesian analysis of series of AMS radiocarbon indications that modify our knowledge of the relative and absolute chronology of the Copper Age in the Great Hungarian Plain and the beginning of the Bronze Age in southern Germany and Central Europe. The results of relevant analyses have been reported as well as their importance for better understanding of the determinants of chronological and periodization patterns has been commented.Pozycja From Magical Valorization to Radiocarbon Chronology. Changes in Determining Age of Prehistoric Artifacts(Fundacja Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego, 2016) Woźny, JacekChanges in determining age of prehistoric artifacts are closely linked to the search for objective grounds for reconstructing the history of human culture. In the Middle Ages, the origin of archaeological finds was explained by natural forces. For instance, it was thought that the Earth gives birth to vessels and keeps the bones of mythical creatures. For the religious worldview, it was the Bible that constituted the basis for perceiving the world. Chronology of ancient monuments referred to biblical events. Findings of antediluvian animals and plants were described. The existence of an antediluvian man was discussed. The age of these findings was estimated to reach several thousand years BC. Scientific methods of studying the chronology of prehistory developed in the mid-19th century, after the introduction of system of three ages by C.J. Thomsen. It was thought that social evolution was an objective source of cultural change, corresponding with K. Darwin’s ideas. Improvement of methods for determining the age of archaeological artifacts took place in the second half of the 20th century, thanks to C14 dating. Despite the conviction of archaeologists of the objectivity of radiocarbon chronology, it raises many objections and controversies. This proves that there is no single research method leading to objective knowledge about prehistory.Pozycja Two Fibulae from the Early Iron Age Found out of Context in Eastern Wielkopolska(Fundacja Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego, 2016) Kaczmarek, Maciej; Wawrzyniak, MateuszThe paper discusses the non-contextual finds of two bronze fibulae, coming from the Early Iron Age, revealed in eastern Wielkopolska by amateur metal detecting searchers (detectorists). One of them represents an unknown form, morphologically similar to Tłukomy type, whereas the other one (only its bow has been preserved) probably belongs to the Wymysłowo-Wroblewo type, isolated in the items collection as a brooch with a decorative foot (Fusszierfibeln). Both copies are an element to research the relative chronology of the decline of the Hallstatt period and the beginning of the Pre-Roman period in Wielkopolska.