Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego T. 37 (2016)
URI dla tej Kolekcjihttp://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/2609
Przeglądaj
Przeglądanie Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego T. 37 (2016) według Autor "Bobak, Dariusz"
Aktualnie wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyniki na stronie
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Chronologia osadnictwa szeleckiego na stanowisku Lubotyń 11, pow. głubczycki, w świetle bayesowskiego modelowania datowań(Muzeum Okręgowe w Rzeszowie, 2016) Bobak, Dariusz; Połtowicz-Bobak, Marta; Jary, Zdzisław; Raczyk, Jerzy; Moska, PiotrThis article attempts to clarify the Szeletian chronology of the site Lubotyń 11 on the Głubczyce Plateau. The site, maintained in a good condition, has a series of radiocarbon and OSL dating. By the use of the method of Bayesian modelling, a model has been constructed, taking into account the stratigraphic relationships between the natural and cultural events observed at the site. It allowed us to restore the history of the site and, in particular, to establish two facts regarding the Palaeolithic settlement. Although the site is a remnant of multiple stays of human groups, and the flint material clearly indicates the presence of older and younger Szeletian phase, now it is not possible to separate chronologically settlement episodes. The established beginning of the settlement appears to be the earliest known chronological point within the operation of the Szeletian culture.Pozycja Statystyczna analiza zespołów grobowych z cmentarzyska tarnobrzeskiej kultury łużyckiej w Kłyżowie, pow. stalowowolski(Muzeum Okręgowe w Rzeszowie, 2016) Bobak, Dariusz; Trybała-Zawiślak, KatarzynaThis paper is intended to provide a statistical analysis of burial complexes from the cemetery of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture in Kłyżów. The analysis aimed to verify the findings regarding the division of inventories into groups (chronologically relevant) by means of traditional “intuitive” methods based on typological analysis of complexes. Moreover, an attempt to indicate the coexistence of particular artefacts was made and individual characteristics of human remains in given complexes. The conducted analyses confirmed the earlier (made by the use of traditional methods) division of inventories into the groups and they allowed us to observe certain rules of coexistence of various types of artefacts in burial complexes.