Przeglądanie według Temat "dispute"
Aktualnie wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyniki na stronie
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Konflikt z perspektywy erystyki i eutoryki(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2017) Korwin-Piotrowska, DorotaThe article analyzes conflict as a phenomenon connected with persuasion – close to disputes or quarrels, yet not identical with them. The background for the considerations encompasses works from various fields: sociology, linguistics, philosophy, and psychology, but rhetoric remains in the very center. The author characterizes its part dealing with absolute winning in disputes, i.e. eristic, and it presents a counterbalance to it and to the agonistic attitude. This complement is eutoric (author’s own term) as a branch of rhetoric which concentrates on positive communication based on mutual listening, empathy and a constructive dialogue, which favors prevention of conflicts, or possibly resolving them. Eutoric has its source in philosophy of dialogue, pragmalinguistics, psychology of persuasion, as well as in the theory and practice connected with mediations and negotiations.Pozycja Mediator and their role in collective disputes(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2020) Kowalczyk, AnetaMediation, as a way of resolving disputes, including collective disputes, is associated with relatively small regulatory interference by the legislator, which is reflected by one of its features, i.e. a lack of formal constraints. Therefore, the question arises about the mediator’s role in resolving collective disputes. Undoubtedly, they must guarantee to be impartial, however, it should be remembered that parties to a collective dispute are its hosts. Hence, it seems that the importance of an appropriate mediation technique cannot be overstated and it can be concluded that it will have a decisive impact on the successful completion of mediation. Therefore, the mediator’s role is primarily to help the parties communicate so that the conflict does not escalate during the mediation process.