Polityka i Społeczeństwo nr 4(18)/2020
URI dla tej Kolekcjihttp://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/6292
Przeglądaj
Przeglądanie Polityka i Społeczeństwo nr 4(18)/2020 według Temat "COVID-19 pandemic"
Aktualnie wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyniki na stronie
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja E-komunikowanie publiczne w warunkach pandemii COVID-19 – doświadczenia małych miast Dolnego Śląska(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2020) Glinka, KamilThe aim of the article is to analyze the process of public e-communication in the so-called first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., between March and August 2020. The selection of the studied cases – seventy-two small towns in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship – allows for the following hypothesis: there is a certain model of public e-communication about the COVID-19 pandemic based on specific: (1) institutional and legal solutions; (2) instruments; (3) thematic threads. The use of several different, though complementary, research methods (comparative analysis, content analysis, questionnaire) leads to the conclusion that the hypothesis can be confirmed only partially. It turns out that the process of e-communication between small towns and the internal environment (inhabitants) is based on certain truncated "components", which does not change the fact that these towns also perceive the need to exchange content (in the form of text, graphics, audio or video) on the nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and related changes and limitations.Pozycja Relacje pomiędzy samorządem terytorialnym a administracją rządową w warunkach pandemii COVID-19(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2020) Bojarowicz, TomaszThe aim of the study is to show the mutual relations between the government administration and local government units in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. The article uses the decision-making method in order to analyse the actions taken and the decision-making process. Discourse analysis is used to study the communication process between the government administration and local government administration. To analyse the legal acts adopted during the pandemic, an institutional and legal analysis was used. New, serious challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the difficult, tense relations between the local government and the central administration, nor did they weaken the conflict between them. In the period of the epidemic, the current animosities, which had existed even before its outbreak, were reinforced. They were related to the dispute between the omnipotence of the state and decentralist tendencies. Additionally, new discrepancies, resulting from the consequences of the epidemic and radical actions taken in relation to it, arose.