Should oophoropexy be a standard procedure after ovarian torsion in premenarchal patients? A case-based review of fixation indications and techniques

dc.contributor.authorNogaj, Zuzanna
dc.contributor.authorJanuszkiewicz-Lewandowska, Danuta
dc.contributor.authorKaźmierowska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorJurczok, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMańkowski, Przemysław
dc.contributor.authorSosnowska-Sienkiewicz, Patrycja
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-19T11:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2026-06
dc.descriptionWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for their anonymized information to be published in this article.
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and aim. Ovarian torsion is a rare but significant cause of acute abdomen in children. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. While Doppler ultrasound is essential, it is not definitive. Laparoscopy with detorsion remains the diagnostic and therapeutic standard. For recurrent and high-risk cases, oophoropexy is considered, but there is no consensus on its indications or optimal technique. We analyze the diagnostic process, reasons for recurrence, and outcomes of different oophoropexy techniques. Description of the case. A premenarchal girl experienced three episodes of ipsilateral ovarian torsion. After the second recurrence, she underwent laparoscopic oophoropexy via fixation posterior to the uterus to the ovarian fossa with absorbable sutures, which failed. Following a third torsion, a laparotomy with a subsequent oophoropexy to the round ligament using non-absorbable sutures achieved a long-term recurrence-free period. Conclusion. Retorsion remains a significant risk. This case provides a unique intrapatient comparison, demonstrating that the technical approach influences the outcomes. Fixation to the abdominal wall with non-absorbable sutures proved to be superior in this scenario, preventing further recurrence. The patient's age and torsion etiology are critical in selecting a fixation method. This report highlights the potential for oophoropexy failure and offers vital technical insights, underscoring the need for further studies to standardize practices for fertility preservation.eng
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine T. 24, z. 2 (2026), s. 417–422
dc.identifier.doi10.15584/ejcem.2026.2.6
dc.identifier.issn2544-1361
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/12638
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRzeszów University Press
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectabdomen
dc.subjectacute
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectfertility
dc.subjectoophoropexy
dc.subjectovarian torsion
dc.titleShould oophoropexy be a standard procedure after ovarian torsion in premenarchal patients? A case-based review of fixation indications and techniques
dc.typearticle

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Ładowanie...
Miniatura
Name:
18.Should+oophoropexy+be+a+standard+procedure+after+ovarian.pdf
Size:
317.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licencja

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Ładowanie...
Miniatura
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.28 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: