Позіховський, Oлександр2023-08-192023-08-192022-12Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego, t. 43/2022, s. 219-222978-83-8277-106-00137-5725https://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/9281In 1935, T. Sulimirski, in a grotto near the village of Kołokolin, examined two destroyed burials, which he referred to the third period of the Neolithic period in accordance with the contemporary periodization, and proposed separating a local group of the Lublin-Volyn culture. Currently, these burials are associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture. However, the analysis of the artefacts discovered indicates that they represent two different taxonomic units. One of them, containing an amphora, should be associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture, the others with the local group (phase) of the Pleszów-Modlnica Lengyel culture. This is confirmed by analogies both from settlements and burials of the aforementioned group (phase) from the Kraków region.In 1935, T. Sulimirski excavated two destroyed burials in a grotto near the village Kołokolin, which he referred to the third period of the Neolithic period in accordance with the periodization of that time, and proposed separating a local group of the Lublin-Volyn culture. Currently, these burials are associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture. However, the analysis of the artefacts discovered there indicates that they represent two different taxonomic units. One of them, containing an amphora, should be associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture, whereas the others are linked with the local Pleszów-Modlnica group (phase) of the Lengyel culture. This is confirmed by analogies both from settlements and burials of the aforementioned group (phase) from the Kraków region.ukrAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/eneolithicKołokolinLublin-Volyn culturePleszów-Modlnick group (phase)Lengyel culturearticle10.15584/misroa.2022.43.12