Miszczuk, Andrzej2017-01-032017-01-032016Polityka i Społeczeństwo nr 3(14)/2016, s. 77–961732-9639http://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/2268The aim of the article is to illustrate the specificity of the new paradigm for the development of tourism as well as the evaluation – in its framework – of the selected strategic documents concerning two underdeveloped Voivodeships of Eastern Poland, i.e. the Lublin and Subcarpathian Voivodeships. The choice of those two Voivodeships was intentional, since they are both characterised by interesting natural and cultural values, however, tourism is not a significant stimulus for development and competitiveness enhancement within either the national and international dimension. From the analysis of the selected strategic documents one may conclude that strategic planning of a new approach towards development of tourism is becoming more widespread, though its possible innovative nature is barely noticeable.polUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polskahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/strategic planningtourismLublin VoivodeshipSubcarpathian VoivedeshipTurystyka jako przedmiot planowania strategicznego administracji publicznejTourism as a field of strategic planning of public administrationarticle10.15584/polispol.2016.3.6