Przeglądanie według Temat "historia literatury polskiej"

Aktualnie wyświetlane 1 - 7 z 7

Drogi rozwojowe dziewiętnastowiecznej literatury polskiej według Wincentego Pola
(Agencja Wydawnicza a linea, 2015) Stanisz, Marek
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza poglądów Wincentego Pola na dzieje literatury polskiej w XIX wieku, przedstawionych w cyklu wykładów pt. "Pamiętnik do literatury polskiej XIX wieku" (Lwów 1866).
Europejski wymiar literatury polskiej według Wincentego Pola
(Agencja Wydawnicza a linea, 2015) Stanisz, Marek
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza poglądów Wincentego Pola na narodowe i ponadnarodowe wartości literatury polskiej, zawartych w cyklu wykładów pt. "Pamiętnik do literatury polskiej XIX wieku" (Lwów 1866). Według Pola literatura polska stanowi formę ekspresji „ducha narodowego”, ale rozwija się pod ciśnieniem biegunowo sprzecznych, wyraziście spolaryzowanych sił: wierności tradycji rodzimej oraz naporu obcych wpływów. Ta sprzeczność decyduje o paradoksalnym charakterze koncepcji Pola. Cechuje ją silne napięcie między nakazem wierności polskim wartościom narodowym a postulatem otwarcia kultury na idee płynące z Europy.
Książki wyzwalają emocje
(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2017) Żórawska, Natalia
This article is a review of the book by Ryszard Koziołek entitled „Dobrze się myśli literature” (Literature is a good way of thinking). This publication is a collection of essays in which the literary expert considers the essence of contemporary reading. Koziołek pays special attention to emotions accompanying reading – bot the latest literature and the books considered to be classic ones. He indicates that literature is a special kind of continuity which can be analyzed through the prism of many fields of science, among others, economics or psychology.
Niewygodny romantyk – zapomniana twórczość hrabiego Henryka Rzewuskiego
(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2013) Dworak, Anna Marta
The study proposed here contains a vast elaboration on Iwona Węgrzyn’s monograph entitled "In the World of Henryk Rzewuski Novels" (Jagiellonian University Press, Kraków 2012, 386 pages). The author deals with the forgotten and barely examined oeuvre of Henryk Rzewuski. She notices that, for many years, Rzewuski’s works have been neglected due to his controversial political views. The author treats these stereotypes with criticism and offers an in-depth analysis of the individual works, trying to understand the political, ideological and artistic choices Rzewuski made. The author depicts the count as an original writer, whose line of thinking was very much different from those of the majority of contemporary writers who condemned him to general isolation and incomprehension. Iwona Węgrzyn discusses almost all the works by Rzewuski and relates them to their contemporary social, political and cultural contexts. Much space has been given to the author’s activities in the literary community at that time. The study proposed by Iwona Węgrzyn is very illuminating. It is characterized by a multitude of the issues addressed and by insightful academic investigations.
Odyniec po drugiej stronie lustra
(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2016) Szargot, Maciej
The article is a review of the book by Maria Makaruk, "Antoni Edward Odyniec – romantyk w zwierciadle biedermeieru", which was published in Warsaw in 2012. The book is devoted to the life and works of the poet connected with two literary currents, Romanticism and Biedermeier. This interesting and valuable volume is complemented by an anthology of Odyniec’s works.
Sienkiewicza przygody z literaturą „trzecią”
(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2016) Szargot, Barbara
The article is a review of the book by Agnieszka Kuniczuk-Trzcinowicz, "Sienkiewicza talent i intuicja. Studia i szkice" ["Talent and Intuition of Sienkiewicz. Studies and Sketches"], published in Opole in 2014. The publication is an interesting example of analysis of relations between popular literary conventions and the works by Sienkiewicz. According to the reviewer, the essential merit of the book is the ambitious comparative idea – conventions of popular literature are observed not only in the novels by Henryk Sienkiewicz, but also in other 19th century works that belong to the canon of high literature.
Szkoła Juliusza Nowaka-Dłużewskiego. Powinowactwa historycznoliterackie
(Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2013) Podgórski, Wojciech J.
Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski (31.03.1893, Goszcza – 19.04.1972, Warszawa), a literary scholar and historian, a teacher in secondary schools in Kielce and Warszawa. He did Polish Studies and his PhD in 1932 at the Jagiellonian University in the care of his promoter, Professor Ignacy Chrzanowski. During World War II he lectured at Kielce branch of Polish Studies of University of Western Lands. After the war he habilitated in Toruń on the basis of his monograph dedicated to priest Stanisław Konarski, afterwards, he took a job as a substitute for a Professor at Catholic University of Lublin and as an associate professor at University of Warsaw. His teaching and pedagogic service bore fruit in 1938 in the form of the Gold Cross of Merits. Post-war frameworks of reconstruction and the effort of the preservation from destruction of post-courtly collections from the position of the director of the National Museum in Kielce resulted in the Order of Polonia Restituta (1963). Finally, Nowak-Dłużewski’s research and development works met with recognition from the jury of the Włodzimierz Pietrzak Literary Award two times (1964, 1967). The memoir dedicated to Professor J. Nowak-Dłużewski develops from his student’s conviction about the perfection of his didactic and educational mission performed by him with devotion during the difficult times when Communism was on the rampage. We experienced Professor’s special care and foresight in the last decade of his life (1962-1972), when he resolved to “remake us into angels” by destining us for creative work in conditions close to monastic closure – in the team of a PhD seminary. A doubtless protagonist of the given text is our Master, Professor Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski. For this reason, the references include only articles and utterances of particular people with the intention of underlining our interpersonal master-pupils bond. To my mind, this aspect appears to excuse the author in the eyes of Colleagues as well as Readers.